Answer: Their view is not going to be changed unless you give them solid information and convince them. They see you as an obstacle to their beliefs.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. She assumes that the reader wants a "not yappy" and large(60+ pound) dog
2. She states that they "present problems that smaller dogs avoid".
3. The author worries about the dog's lifetime, travel hassle, reach, and strength.
4. The author's ideal dog is one that lives long, is easy to take places, can't reach up on countertops, and is not strong enough to pull during walks.
Explanation:
Not much to explain. The writer seems to be very biased towards dogs. :)
Based on the given scenario above, the answer would be option B. A secondary source. It is a secondary source since it is already seen in the magazines or printed articles and not directly from the person him/herself. Hope this answers your question.
Answer:
You might take the idiom literally and you might think something different happened
Hope this helps :)
He wanted to know gatsby better. After all he is mysterious and gatsby has been intriguing to him.
