That's a lot of questions. First, they're asking for how much each person pledged. Ivan said he would give $4.25, plus $1.25 per mile. As an expression, that would be 1.25m+4.25 . Vicky said that she would give $5.75, plus $.75 per mile, which would be .75m+5.75 . The second problem asks you to add the two, so add 1.25m and .75m to get the total amount she would earn per mile, which is $2. If I got paid $2 for every mile I biked, I would bike a marathon. Then add the flat payments of $4.25 and $5.75, and you get $10. So, the final equation would be 2m+10.
The last question is asking for you to find an equivalent proportional expression. To find this, you can just dividing by the greatest common factor of the two numbers. I got 2, so the equation would be 1m+5.
The sampling method used in the situation of the quality control analyst in his attempt to avoid staying after work would be a non-probability sampling method. He used a nonprobability sampling called convenience sampling wherein the person gets a sample for easy and convenient results.
Answer:
100 inches squared.
Step-by-step explanation:
10x10=100
Well you may already know that 8 x 5 = 40.
So, add zeros.
80 x 50 = 4,000.
So now, make it division.
4,000/80 = 50.
<span>The correct answer is B. False. Every individual person perceives emotions differently and reacts to them differently meaning that there is no objective way to determine their strength. That's why crying is not a measure for sadness nor is laughing a measure for happiness and both can easily be simulated, or a person can be extremely sad yet not cry at all.</span>
