In 1978, China announced a new policy to open the door to foreign businesses and investments that wanted to set up in China.
<h3>What did china do in 1978?</h3>
In 1978, Deng announced a new policy that opened the door to foreign businesses that wanted to set up in China.
For the first time, the country was open to foreign investment and encouraged investment by private companies from other countries.
Therefore, A is the correct option.
Learn more about China here:
brainly.com/question/9695945
#SPJ1
Answer: only disaffirm the entire contract.
Explanation: Egbert, age sixteen, who purchases a $500 video-game system and a $50 computer chair from CompuStore. Egbert changes his mind and wants to avoid the contract for the video-game system but not the computer chair. However, Egbert may only disaffirm the entire contract.
Answer:
The answers are:
<u>January 10</u>
Cash $816,000
Common stock $510,000
Contributed capital in excess
of par value, common stock $306,000
<u>January 15</u>
Equipment $80,000
Common stock $50,000
Contributed capital in excess
of par value, common stock $30,000
<u>February 1</u>
Organizational expenses $3,000
Common stock $25,000
Contributed capital in excess
of par value, common stock $500
Explanation:
Contributed capital in excess of par value is the amount of money (or other assets) over the par value of stock (in this case $5 per common stock) that the company received form shareholders in exchange for stock.
The police power of the states can extend to interstate business.
Explanation:
The 10th amendment to the Constitution in the USA grants States "not reserved to the United States" privileges and responsibilities. This allows States authority to create and enact laws that protect the protection, defense and safety of the people.
The States are interpreted as bound by their terms, and as substantive denials of the right to interfere with the internal activity of the separate States, with the exception, in reality, of any other authority specifically granted or obtained as required and effective means of implementing it.
The Senate had held that any person engaging in interstate commerce liable to "all" employees, including those who has intrastate operations alone, in spite to negligence-related accidents, without clear dependence on the tenth amendment, in the workers ' liability cases. The court ruled that this act has not been unconstitutional.