Answer:
The answer would be neutrality of money theory
Explanation:
The neutrality of money theory claims that changes in the money supply affect the prices of goods, services, and wages but not overall economic productivity. Many of today's economists believe the theory is still applicable, at least over the long run.
Answer:
$1,070
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the amount of applied overhead is:
Using this formula
Applied overhead = Total cost of WIP - Direct materials - Direct labor
Let plug in the formula
Applied overhead= $3,550 - $1,610 - $870
Applied overhead=$1,070
Therefore the amount of applied overhead is:$1,070
1. What is the variable overhead spending variance? (HINT: The answer $980 unfavorable, but I need work to support this)
2. What is the variable overhead efficiency variance? (HINT: The answer is $4,040 unfavorable, but I need work to support this)
Answer:
<em>Sorry, I could not type the answer here directly because it doesn't allow me.</em>
It should be "spam" followed by "at"<em> (the symbol sign) </em>and "uce" plus "." and "gov"
There should be no spaces.
Explanation:
A "spam" refers to<em> an email that you do not want in your inbox</em>. They are mostly intended for commercial purposes–including some emails that are deceptive. There are actually many ways to reduce the amount of spam reaching your email. For example, you could use an <em>email filter </em>or choose a <em>unique email address. </em>
Kenny above wants to report the spam he is receiving, thus, he needs to forward it to the Federal Trade Commission <em>(FTC). </em>They are responsible for helping Kenny clear his inbox from spams.
Answer: C the fallacy of composition.
Explanation:
The Fallacy of Composition is meant to explain the false logic that people apply when they believe that because something is true of a subsection of something, then that thing must be true for the whole thing.
For instance, my phone's batter is made of lithium so my entire phone must be made of lithium.
In this scenario, the logic is that it is good to be involved in military conflict because it favors the nation if it favors a subset (employees in defense) which is flawed because other industries might suffer. This however, represents the fallacy of composition.