Answer:
like what i said dont give up
Explanation: head up hi
Answer:
The correct answer is A. As a result of 20th century Supreme Court rulings, symbolic political speech gained substantial protections from government regulations.
Explanation:
Symbolic speech is a term that describes communicative situations in which the message transmitted is not literally expressed by the interlocutor. This type of speech is covered by the First Amendment implicitly.
Rulings such as Tinker v. Des Moines, United States v. O'Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and Cohen v. California expanded the protection of this type of discourse, including it within the protections of the First Amendment to freedom of expression.
For example, in the case Texas v. Johnson, it was established that the burning of an American flag involved a case of symbolic speech, so it should not be subject to prohibition by any type of law.
I believe it was John C. Frémont
Correct me if im wrong☺
Answer:
The bad economy in America could cause conflict between the rich and poor people. This was the reason for the Chalmers to equate independence "with slavery on plain truth".
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Plain truth is the concept proposed by James Chalmer to evaluate the life story of Amish farm, followed by the mysterious story of the dead baby.
- It explains the American revolution during the period of independence.
- James Chalmers was a military agent who has immigrated to America after the independence war.
- According to him, a poor economy in a country would lead to internal conflicts between the minds of people.
- He demanded more wealth from the people, for expanding his army base and soldiers, but he failed to serve for people in America.
Answer : is c , just had this question <3
