Answer:
Osiris, Isis, Set, Nephthys, and Horus the Elder in July. The Egyptians regulated their calendar with these five magical days. Iah was eventually absorbed into the god Khonsu
Answer:
the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States launched an international war on terrorism defined by military intervention, nation building, and efforts to reshape the politics of the Middle East. As of 2017, however, it has become clear that the American strategy has destabilized the Middle East while doing little to protect the United States from terrorism.
After 15 years of considerable strategic consistency during the presidencies of George Bush and Barack Obama, Donald Trump now takes the reins having promised to “bomb the sh—” out of ISIS and “defeat them fast.” At the same time, however, Trump broke sharply in his campaign rhetoric from Republican orthodoxy on Iraq and Afghanistan. Whatever President Trump decides to do, an evaluation of the War on Terror should inform his policies.
We argue that the War on Terror failed. This failure has two fundamental—and related—sources. The first is the inflated assessment of the terror threat facing the United States, which led to an expansive counterterrorism campaign that did not protect Americans from terrorist attacks. The second source of failure is the adoption of an aggressive strategy of military intervention.
The lessons from the War on Terror indicate that it is time for the United States to take a different approach. Policymakers need to acknowledge that although terrorism is a serious concern, it represents only a modest security threat to the American homeland. Further, the United States should abandon the use of military intervention and nation building in the War on Terror. Instead, the United States should push regional partners to confront terrorist groups abroad, while the U.S. returns to an emphasis on the intelligence and law enforcement paradigm for combating the threat against the American homeland.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
We are talking about colonial times in North America, where white English people left Britain in order to pursue new goals and have better opportunities in the new continent.
The development of the southern colonies stemmed from the effort and perseverance of the people. The southern colonies were Maryland, Virginia, and Carolina, which years after divided in two: North and South Carolina. The location and place of these southern colonies were an important factor for their development. The good soil of the land and good climate conditions allowed farmers to grow great crops to the degree that southern colonies were known as the "breadbasket of America." They exported their crops to Europe, where there was a big demand for corn, Indigo, rice, and tobacco. This represented a big advantage for economic development.
Regarding the relations with Native American Indian tribes, at first, colonists tried to maintain a peaceful coexistence to try to live in harmony with them, but things complicated when more people arrived at these regions and tried to exploit more raw materials that were in the Indian territories.
Answer:
Explanation:
First of all, the audience obviously does not know (or least well), who the boxers are. Moreover we can suspect that it is a Christian community because the writing style sets out to prove how
corrupt Yu Hsien is
- how the propaganda machine painted Christians (as anachists who wanted to overthrow the current government).
- So now the gods and men were stirred up against them to exterminate the foreign devils.
- The Boxers were united and angry -- probably something the intended audience didn't know
It was Germany im pretty sure
:)
