1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin [286]
3 years ago
8

In a well-written paragraph, explain how the governments of two different countries are similar and different. Use at least two

of the following terms in your response: autocracy, oligarchy, democracy, unitary, federation, confederation, parliamentary.
History
1 answer:
Ulleksa [173]3 years ago
4 0

In Germany, the power is with the people (=it's a democracy) which are represented by the members of the parliament: it's a representative democracy. It's also a federation of 16 states. 

Iran, on the other hand is a theocracy: a country ruled by the members of the clergy. It can also be named an oligarchy: the power is with a few members of the society.

You might be interested in
OMG PLZZZZ HELLLLLPPPPP
Pie

Answer: I think it is C

6 0
3 years ago
Which was a result of the Great Schism?
Natalka [10]

Answer:C. There were two popes

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
According the Timothy May, what was one action taken by the Mongols to control the territory they conquered
Gekata [30.6K]
  1. The Mongols used qualified people wherever they were needed/Mongols placed Arabs in Russia/Persians in China because they were qualified
  2. Working bureaucracies were kept in place
  3. Many local rulers maintained their position as long as they paid tribute/provided troops/pledged loyalty/kept good order
  4. Chinese bureaucrats still did their jobs as long as they did not cause the Mongols any trouble
  5. Local Persian rulers stayed in power if they cooperated

These are five examples of answers, hope one can help you!

8 0
3 years ago
What was the net effect of the opinions delivered by the Marshall Court? How did these opinions reflect John Marshall's philosop
Anna71 [15]
The net effect of the opinions delivered by the Marshall Court was that the Supreme Court became much more powerful--on par with the legislative and executive branches, which proves that Marshall believed that government should be limited with checks and balances. 
6 0
3 years ago
The u.s. senators that refused to participate in the league of nations argued that:
raketka [301]
Tony Riggs: "The plan for the League of Nations was part of the peace treaty that ended World War 1. By law, the United States Senate would have to vote on the treaty. President Wilson believed that the senate would have to approve it if the American people demanded it.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the most significant result of the Spanish colonization of central and South America
    5·2 answers
  • S. This branch of Government in this final authority<br> on the Constitution?
    6·1 answer
  • What did the Athenians do in preparation for Xerxes's invasion?
    9·2 answers
  • Points
    10·2 answers
  • How did joseph stalin create a totalitarian sate
    9·1 answer
  • Expiain how the technoiogies developed to end all wars just led to more deaths during world war 1
    6·2 answers
  • Which term best describes the system of government created by the Framers?
    11·1 answer
  • All fossils that have been discovered make the fossil
    14·1 answer
  • Which statements give examples of how the use of resources has changed?
    7·2 answers
  • 5. How are Vinny's parents' points of view about the pond different?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!