Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
Answer:
It takes a limited or no role in business or trade.
Explanation:
Capitalism is the system of trade that encourages buying and selling to make maximum profit.
The government does not take an active role in capitalism as it is run and operated by individuals. The only duty the government has is to pass laws that would regulate such business to prevent monopoly, etc.
Therefore, the government takes a limited or no role in business or trade.
A monarchy is run by one ruler, whereas a patriarchy is run by religious
Amasia was on the edge of the Roman empire, and when strabo was born around 64 B.C.
Answer:
el culo nativo fantástico el marrione
