<u>Answer:</u>
B) Union troops wanted to strike fear into Confederates by devastating their towns.
C) Union troops sought to destroy resources that Confederate troops needed to fight.
These statements reveal about Union tactics during the Civil War.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Union state tactics to win the civil war was simple, which was aimed to break the resource supply so that the confederate army would become vulnerable and shatter the towns on their way to create fear among the people.
<u>The northern army had 5 major goals-
</u>
1. To block their help from abroad by taking control over the southern coasts.
2. Taking control over the Mississippi river so that it would separate Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas from other Confederate states.
3. To capture Richmond.
4. To shatter the morale of civilians
5. To use the troop size and break the spirit of the confederate army.
Answer: Because it showed that change is possible
Explanation/context:
The medieval era had been one in which the Roman Catholic Church dominated the culture of Europe, and it was thought that no one could successfully challenge such a deeply ingrained institution. However, the Reformation movement by Martin Luther and other Protestant figures showed that even something as entrenched and enduring at the Catholic Church could be challenged, and changes could be accomplished. Even during Martin Luther's lifetime, this idea that change was possible motivated people to launch efforts toward other major changes to powerful systems. The Peasants Revolt that occurred in Germany in 1524-1525 took Luther's push for reform in the church and applied it to make a push for change in feudal society. Martin Luther himself didn't agree with that and opposed the Peasants Revolt, but as Schaff points out, the momentum of the Reformation was a "propelling force" inspiring other "forward movements" to make changes in society.
Islamic scholars preserved some of art and literature’s most classical works, inspiring the Europeans.
Answer:
The main cause of the English Civil War in 1642 was the never-ending argument between King Charles X and the Parliament. King Charles was bold and obnoxious and stuck-up which eventually lead to his death. Both parties had their own ways of thinking/basic truths/rules about religion and money. During the heat of discussions, King Charles never listened and made decisions all by himself, which seemed like he was ruling out the powers of Parliament.
This crack (or argument) between the King and the Parliament resulted to a war that divided the country. King Charles X's famous enemy in government was Oliver Cromwell, one of the people who signed his death warrant in the year 1649.
Answer: they did not set up a church-run state.
