Answer:
The margin for Alyeska Services Company: 29.48
The turnover for Alyeska Services Company: 49.01
The return on investment for Alyeska Services Company: 14.45
Explanation:
Please find the below for detailed explanation and calculations:
We have the formula for calculating the ratios as require in the question: Margin = Net operating income/ Sales ; Turnover = Sales/Average operating assets; Return on investment = Net operating income/ Average operating assets.
Thus, we have:
The margin for Alyeska Services Company is calculated as Net operating income/ Sales or 5,100,000/17,300,000 = 29.48%;
The turnover for Alyeska Services Company is calculated as Sales/Average operating assets or 17,300,000/35,300,000 = 49.01%;
The return on investment for Alyeska Services Company is calculated as Net operating income/ Average operating assets: 5,100,000/35,300,000 = 14.45%.
Hope this is helpful to you.
Answer:
Balance sheet
Explanation:
Balance sheet: In the balance sheet, the assets, liabilities, and stockholder equity is recorded. In this the accounting equation is used which is shown below:
Total assets = Total liabilities + stockholder equity
The debit and credit side of the balance sheet should always be equal and balanced.
Moreover, it always is prepared on the specified date.
It analyzes the financial profitability, position, performance of the business organization
Answer:
B) $(1,813)
Explanation:
Initial investment = 17,550
Annual cashflows = 2,650
Terminal Cashflow = 500
You can solve for NPV using financial calculator with the following inputs;
CF0= -17,550
C01 = 2,650
F01 (Frequency) = 19
C02 = 2,650 + 500 = 3,150
I=16%
Net present value; NPV = -1,812.879 or -1,813 rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Answer: Most economist believe that prices are flexible in the long run but many are sticky in the short run.
Explanation:
Prices are sticky in the short run because producers and buyers take time to adapt to new situations. If there is a shortage of butter, lets say, the economic theory says that the prices will rise because there is less butter ( ceteris paribus = all the other factors remain constant). Actually, buyers and suppliers need time to adapt to the new situation. However, in the long run buyers and suppliers have time to adapt to new situations so prices become more flexible.
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
