Answer: c. legal but unethical
Explanation:
With John being in charge of the loan application when Albert came to apply, John had access to Albert's information.
John then used this information which he had LEGAL access to, to recommend a bank product to Albert.
This is legal but UNETHICAL because Albert did not know that any information he gave will be used for a reason different from his application for a loan.
Answer:
The loss of the financial institution is $413,000
Explanation:
Let's say that after 3 years the financial institution will receive:
0.5 * 10% of $10million
= 0.5 * 0.1 * 10000000
= $500,000
Then, they will pay 0.5 * 9% of $10M
= 0.5 * 0.09 * 10000000
= $450,000
Therefore, their immediate loss would be $500000 - $450000
= $50000.
Let's assume that forward rates are realized to value the rest of the swap.
The forward rates = 8% per annum.
Therefore, the remaining cash flows are assumed that floating payment is
0.5*0.08*10000000 =
$400,000
Received net payment would be:
500,000-400,000= $100,000. The total cost of default is therefore the cost of foregoing the following cash flows:
Year 3=$50,000
Year 3.5=$100,000
Year 4 = $100,000
Year 4.5= $100,000
Year 5 = $100,000
Discounting these cash flows to year 3 at 4% per six months, the cost of default would be $413,000
Answer:
Total product cost= $181,000
Explanation:
<u>The product cost is the sum of the direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead:</u>
Direct materials $ 70,000
Direct labor $ 37,000
Variable manufacturing overhead $ 12,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 25,000
Total manufacturing overhead $ 37,000
Total product cost= $181,000
Answer: my reaction would probably not be good
Explanation:
Answer:
substitution effect The supply curve slopes upward because at a higher price, producers have an incentive to produce more.
Explanation: Google
