Answer:
A) Using a change management system to influence performance
Explanation:
First of all, since the change was proposed by the customer, any delay in the construction project caused by their new request should not trigger the damage clause.
The contractor should use a change management system so the existing baseline is not altered by the delay. A change management system is responsible for managing all the changes that might occur during the project's inception until its completion. It is important that all changes or alterations to the original schedule are properly recorded and authorized (in this case to prevent the damage clause).
By using the change management system, the organization has a standardized methodology for handling changes in the project's schedule. This way any negative impact can be reduced.
Answer: Decrease and Increase
Explanation:
According to the Mundell–Fleming model, in an economy with flexible exchange rates, expansionary fiscal policy will cause the net exports to decrease. Expansionary fiscal policy shifts the IS curve rightwards, as a result BOP surplus created in the economy. So, exchange rate decreases to shift the BOP back to its initial position. As a result of lower exchange rate, exports falls. Hence, net exports decreases.
Expansionary Monetary policy will cause the net exports to increases. Expansionary Monetary policy shifts the LM curve rightwards, as a result BOP deficit created in the economy. So, exchange rate increases to shift the BOP back to its initial position. As a result of higher exchange rate, exports increases. Hence, net exports increases.
Answer
Hi,
Progressive tax assesses a taxpayer’s ability to pay. Higher rates are on the wealthy than on the poor.
Explanation
Those considered poor according to a country’s definition have families who spend larger shares of their income on the cost of living thus all money they earn is needed to afford basic needs thus face a decreased progressive tax. On the other hand, the progressive tax imposed on wealthy individuals decrease their abilities to purchase more luxury items or invest in stock.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
D. Less; Less
Explanation:
Given that
CPI in 2005 = 1.68
Wage in 1972 = 7200
Wage in 2005 = 30,000
CPI in 1971 = 0.418
Therefore,
Real wage in 1972 = wage in 1972/CPI in 1972
= 7200/0.418
= $17,224.88
Real wage in 2005 = wage in 2005/CPI in 2005
= 30000/1.68
=$17,857.14
Thus, from the given data 1972 job paid LESS in nominal terms (7200 < 30000) and LESS in real terms (17,244.88 < 17,857.14) than the 2005 job.
Answer:
b.$11,088
Explanation:
The computation of the interest expense is shown below
= Cash interest + discount amortized
= ($88,000 × 12%) + ($88,000 - $85,360) ÷ 5 years
= $10,560 + $528
= $11,088
Hence, the interest expense is $11,088
Therefore the correct option is b.
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
