Answer:
Roosevelt's hope was to provide a rationale for why the United States should abandon the isolationist policies that emerged from World War I.
In that context, he summarized the values of democracy behind the bipartisan consensus on international involvement that existed at the time.
*The first is freedom of speech and expression—everywhere in the world.
*The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way—everywhere in the world.
*The third is freedom from want—which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants—everywhere in the world.
*The fourth is freedom from fear—which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor—anywhere in the world.
<em>Marbury v. Madison</em> was significant because it asserted the Supreme Court's right of judicial review -- the ability to declare a law or executive action unconstitutional.
More detail:
- Judicial review refers to the courts' ability to review any law to see if it violates any existing law or any statute of a state constitution or the US Constitution. On the federal level, Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review, to strike down a law as unconstitutional.
- It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
This may help you...
The Upanishads<span> are a collection of texts of religious and philosophical nature, written in </span>India<span> probably between c. 800 BCE and c. 500 BCE, during a time when Indian society started to question the traditional Vedic religious order. Some people during this time decided to engage in the pursuit of spiritual progress, living as ascetic hermits, rejecting ordinary material concerns and giving up family life. Some of their speculations and </span>philosophy<span> were compiled into the Upanishads</span>
The best answer is, D. Male legislators.
Many male legislators elected to the Texas state legislature were opposed the passing of the Texas Equal Rights Amendment because they believed it was unnecessary. Those who supported this stance argued, the laws of the state already in place provided substantial protection for women under the rights of the law. However, this viewpoint was in contrast to many in Texas who supported the movement to pass the Texas Equal Rights Amendment and spoke out against those who did not. Though the law did not initially garner enough support, a version was passed in 1972 protecting one's rights under the law regardless of gender, race, or origin.
The state of Florida, in which the recount later occurred in.
