Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
- Personality inventories
Explanation:
'Personality Inventories' are described as the kind of questionnaires that the researchers employ to assess the personality traits among the respondents who fill it. It assists them in evaluating the distinct type of personalities possessing different social, behavioral, emotional, cultural, encouraging traits and having varied strengths and defects where they lag behind.
As per the given details, since Raman believes that these traits have been consistent over time irrespective of the variations in the circumstances and they can be mesaured, he would most probably employ these 'personality inventories'(questionnaires) to substantiate his claim. These <u>questionnaires would help him in assessing the validity of his belief by evaluating people's personality traits as filled in by them</u>.
Answer: Randomly audit EHR documentation for patients readmitted within 30 days.
Explanation: To determine if hospital policies are being followed, a random judicial examination of electronic health records (EHR) is the best. This is because the probability of getting an accurate result is high since it's just a random sample.
