All categories

4 years ago

Consider the following two securities X and Y.

1 answer:

3 0

Find out how we prove our commitment to our employees every day

Ask us about a new mortgage, existing account or refinancing

Manage balances, payments, alerts and much more

You might be interested in

Flannigan Company manufactures and sells a single product that sells for $450 per unit; variable costs are $270. Annual fixed co

mojhsa [17]

Answer: The break even point in dollars is $2,000,000.

We calculate the break even point (BEP) in dollars as follows:

$\mathbf{BEP = \frac{Fixed Costs}{Contribution Margin Ratio}}$

We calculate Contribution Margin ratio as :

$\mathbf{Contribution Margin Ratio = \frac{Sales - Variable Costs}{Sales}}$

$\mathbf{Contribution Margin Ratio = \frac{450 - 270}{450}} = 0.4$

Substituting the Contribution Margin Ratio in the break even point formula we get,

$\mathbf{BEP = \frac{800000}{0.4}}$

BEP = $2,000,000

7 0

4 years ago

Need help with this question asap plz

Masteriza [31]

The answer is the third one down. The amendment doesn't want people overly fined or overly punished meaning nothing to harsh so the third one down is the answer.

Hope this helps.

8 0

3 years ago

Susan fires her Employee/Agent Martin. They had a disagreement and both decided to part ways. However, Martin had a sour taste i

scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

in this scenario, susan and sam has not done any wrong things.

but Martin has manipulated sam to take revenge from susan for firing him.

so in this case, no susan is not obliged to pay. she can take action against martin and after proving in a court of law about martin's manipulation, he will be liable to pay.

Explanation:

5 0

4 years ago

In a given year, Jennifer earns $50,000 and spends $40,000. During the same period, Stcve earns $30,000 and spends $27,000. If J

elena55 [62]

Answer:

The sales tax is regressive with respect to income

Explanation:

sales tax by Jennifer = 0.1*30000

= 3000

tax/income = 3000/50000

= 6%

sales tax by steve = 0.1*27000

= 2700

tax/income = 2700/30000

= 9%

The tax increases with decrease in income, it indeed is regressive on the whole.

Therefore, The sales tax is regressive with respect to income

6 0

3 years ago

The jackson family is undecided about whether or nara buy a new car of the

ICE Princess25 [194]

The question is incomplete. The complete question is :

The Jackson family is undecided about whether or not to buy a new car. If the probability is .9 that they will buy one, and if the probability is .3 that they will buy a Ford, and if the probability is .4 that they will purchase a car getting more than 20 miles per gallon, what is the probability that they will buy either a car getting more than 20 miles per gallon or a Ford, if all Fords get more than 20 miles per gallon?

Solution :

Given that :

The probability of buying a new car, $P(NC) = 0.9$

Probability of buying Ford = 0.3

That is, if Jackson family buy a car that is a ford car, $P(F) = 0.9 \times 0.3$

= 0.27

The probability for getting more than 20 miles per gallon = 0.4

That is if Jackson family buy a car that have more than 20 miles per gallon mileage, $P(20) = 0. 9 \times0.4=0.36$

The conditions

All of the car have more than 20 miles per gallon mileage.

It means that buying a ford car is subset of getting more than 20 miles per gallon.

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cap \ \text{Ford})=P(F)$

Therefore, the probability of buying a car either getting more than 20 miles per gallon or ford = $P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})$

Therefore,

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})=P(20) + P(F) - P(20 \text{ miles per gallon }\cap \ \text{Ford})$

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})=P(20) + P(F) - P(F)$

$P(20 \text{ miles per gallon}\ \cup \ \text{Ford})=P(20)$

= 0.36

Thus the probability that Jackson family is buying a car either getting more than 20 miles per gallon or ford is 0.36

3 0

3 years ago