Answer:
the question is false
Explanation:
you can't sell stock for ownership
Answer:
Yes, Amelia responsible for the $75,000
Explanation:
It is given that Kendra and Amelia are jointly operating the art gallery, they are working together as a partnership. If a person does any work in the partnership business, other has full responsibility for partnership.
In the given question Kendra Has embezzled a $75,000 government grant, which will be responsible for partnership business but in the absence of Kendra, Amelia will also be responsible for all this.
There are 6 requirements for a verbal contract:
An offer. -- they had this
An acceptance. -- the contract was accepted
Competent parties who have the legal capacity to contract. - they both have the right to make this decision
Lawful subject matter. this is not an illegal operation
Mutuality of obligation. Both parties are obligated to do something in this case.
Consideration. if there were discussions of payment, then yes this is a legally enforceable contract.
Answer:
The value of the put option is;
e. $9.00
Explanation:
To determine the value of the put option can be expressed as;
C(t)-P(t)=S(t)-K.e^(-rt)
where;
C(t)=value of the call at time t
P(t)=value of the put at time t
S(t)=current price of the stock
K=strike price
r=annual risk free rate
t=duration of call option
In our case;
C(t)=$7.2
P(t)=unknown
S(t)=$50
K=$55
r=6%=6/100=0.06
t=1 year
replacing;
7.2-P=50-55×e^(-0.06×1)
7.2-P=50-(55×0.942)
7.2-P=50-51.797
P=51.797+7.2-50
P=$8.997 rounded off to 2 decimal places=$9.00
The available demand and goods
