Answer:
Naturalism
Explanation:
In Naturalism movement, it development was independent of realism, based its aesthetics on nature, particularly on humanity's place in the (Darwinian) environment and tried to create life itself on stage.
Naturalism is the belief that nothing exists beyond the natural world and every inclination, or thought are based only on natural desires and instincts; in other words,belief that everything arises from natural properties and causes.
Answer:
c. The dependent variable is the plant heights; the independent variable is the room temperature
Explanation:
Here, the effect of room temperature on the height of plants is being studied. The amount of light the plants get is equal the only differentiating factor is the room temperature.
In an experiment to determine the inter relationship between two variables on variable is changed and the variable which changes with respect to the first variable is studied.
The variable which is changed inpendently i.e., it does not change with respect to another variable is called the independent variable.
The variable which changes with respect to the independent variable is called the dependent variable.
Hence, the plant height is the dependent variable and the room temperature is the independent variable.
D.) because it is fully up to date and usefull
Love, The jokester
hope it helped hehe
The President of the United States of America (POTUS) is the elected head of state <span>and head of government of the United States. The president leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the </span>commander-in-chief<span> of the United States Armed Forces,</span>
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
