Answer:
San Martin did just that, securing Argentinian independence and liberating Chile and Peru from Spanish rule in part through a daring march across the Andes. Though he met with Simon Bolivar, liberator of several northern South American countries, they were unable to agree to greater cooperation.
They are valuable for the appointive procedure. The two gatherings fill in as a quite decent method for getting similarly invested individuals together. In the event that they were not there, it would be substantially harder to distinguish great competitors, motivate them to keep running for office, bolster them.
They fill in as a contradicting element to the intrigue gatherings. In the event that it were not for parties, the intrigue gatherings would be unopposed. The gatherings attempt to pull individuals together in expansive coalitions. The intrigue bunches attempt to pull them separated on single issues.
It was not constitutional
Answer:
They could've found another way or they wouldn't have been able to trade.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
Progressives want to see change occur in social condition.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Progressives means the lawyer of social reform. Movement was conducted to improve political, economic, social and the negative consequences that might came with the industrial revolution with the major focus on social condition.
- Movement stated from early 90’s of nineteenth century and continued to early 30’s of twentieth century.
- They advertise pass food and drug act 1906 and helps to discourage corruption, protect people right of press and protest also supported in banned in selling of alcohol.
