Answer is actively working to achieve civil rights for all
Answer:
Commercial speech is one of the categories of speech that enjoys lesser protection under the First Amendment.
Two types of commercial speech in particular, are given less or null protection: false advertising, and misleading advertising. The justification is to protect the rights of consumers, and of other companies.
If Pizza Hut prints materials that are untruthful about Papa John's, then Pizza Hut is committing misleading advertising, because it is spreading false information about its direct competitor. In this scenario, Pizza Hut could easily sue Papa John's in court, and win the case.
The third reich based its power primarily on intimidation and fear, especially when it came to persecuting the Jews. This was true since the beginning.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "it operates according to the rules of a direct democracy" since in the US there is a system of representative democracy. </span></span><span />
<span>I would suggest treating the Indians in a more humane way. It's also probably better to let an Indian leader (who obeyed our colonists) rule the Indians, because the leader would know the people and better communicate with them. And the colonists could indirectly benefit instead of being in conflict with the Indians directly.</span>
