9514 1404 393
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
The given formula is the "explicit" formula for the sequence.
The recursive formula would be ...
a[1] = 160
a[n] = 1/2·a[n-1] . . . . each term expressed in as a function of previous terms
The given statement is false.
keeping in mind that perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes, hmmmm what's the slope of that line above anyway,
![\bf (\stackrel{x_1}{1}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-1})\qquad (\stackrel{x_2}{4}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{2}) ~\hfill \stackrel{slope}{m}\implies \cfrac{\stackrel{rise} {\stackrel{y_2}{2}-\stackrel{y1}{(-1)}}}{\underset{run} {\underset{x_2}{4}-\underset{x_1}{1}}}\implies \cfrac{2+1}{3}\implies 1 \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%28%5Cstackrel%7Bx_1%7D%7B1%7D~%2C~%5Cstackrel%7By_1%7D%7B-1%7D%29%5Cqquad%20%28%5Cstackrel%7Bx_2%7D%7B4%7D~%2C~%5Cstackrel%7By_2%7D%7B2%7D%29%20~%5Chfill%20%5Cstackrel%7Bslope%7D%7Bm%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cstackrel%7Brise%7D%20%7B%5Cstackrel%7By_2%7D%7B2%7D-%5Cstackrel%7By1%7D%7B%28-1%29%7D%7D%7D%7B%5Cunderset%7Brun%7D%20%7B%5Cunderset%7Bx_2%7D%7B4%7D-%5Cunderset%7Bx_1%7D%7B1%7D%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%2B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Cimplies%201%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill)
so we're really looking for the equation of a line whose slope is -1 and runs through (2,5)
Answer:
113.1
Step-by-step explanation:
A = πr²
A = π (6)²
A = π (36)
A = 113.09 = 113.1
Answer:
9 total
2/9 - 5/9 -2/9 so 3 i guess...
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(-2,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution is the point at which the two lines intersect, (-2,4). That point is the only one that satisfies (works) in both equations:
y = x + 6
4 = -2 + 6
and
y = -0.5x + 3
4 = -0.5(-2) + 3
4 = 1 + 3
====
You can also solve it algebraically:
y = x + 6
y = -0.5x + 3
-0.5x + 3 = x + 6 [Use the value of y from the second equation in the first equation]
-1.5x = 3
x = -2
Use this is y = -2 + 6:
y = 4
(-2,4)
