Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
Depreciation is best described as An estimate of how much of a tangible asset has been used during an accounting period: considered an expense that does not require any cash outflow under the accrual basis accounting.
Depreciation reduces the value of an asset and it reduces it over the life span of an asset. Depreciation is a non cash reduction. Depreciation tells us how much the value of an asset has reduced.
The formula is (cost of the asset - any residual value) ÷ the number of useful life span
Answer: 140%
Explanation:
Efficiency refers to how productive a person is in regards to how production they should be.
Formula is:
= Standard time / Actual time * 100%
= 35/25 * 100%
= 140%
Answer:
$153,333
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What amount should Olympic recognize as compensation expense for 2016
Using this formula
Compensation expense =Total compensation/Vesting period
Let plug in the formula
Compensation expense=($5 x 92,000)/3 years
Compensation expense=$460,000/3 years
Compensation expense=$153,333
Therefore What amount should Olympic recognize as compensation expense for 2016 is $153,333
Answer:
b.use the S-2 employee
Explanation:
Calculation for the the most cost-effective solution
S-1 S-2 S-3
Time for 1 unit (in minutes) 30 24 21
Units in 1 hour 2 2.5 2.857142857
(60/30= 2)
(60/24=2.5)
(60/21=2.857142857)
Wages per hour $ 16.00 $ 19.00 $ 22.00
Wages per/ unit $ 8.00 $7.60 7.70
($ 16.00/2=$8)
($ 19.00/2.5=$ 7.60)
($ 22.00/2.857142857=$ 7.70)
Ranking
S-1 $ 8.00 III
S-2. $7.60 I
S-3 7.70 II
Therefore based on the above Calculation the most cost-effective solution will be to use the S-2 employee
Answer:
The statement is not an express warranty, because it doesn't involve a negotiation of terms between Salazar and Mitsubishi. It is an employee of the company that imploy Salazar to bring the car should the car gives problem, and didn't involve an agreement between the two parties ( Salazar and Mitsubishi)
Explanation:
What is express warranty?
An express warranty arises from the parties’ negotiations in a sales transaction. Express warranties are often included in the written terms of a contract. An “express” warranty by a seller is created by:
Any statement of fact or promise relating to the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the statement or promise.
Any description of the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the description.
Any sample or model, which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the sample or model.
An express warranty may be created even if the seller does not use formal words such as “warranty” or “guarantee,” and even if the seller does not have a specific intention to make a warranty. However, an express warranty is not created merely because the seller makes a statement as to the value of the goods, or as to seller’s opinion of the goods. Generally, statements made by a seller during the course of contract negotiations are treated as statements of fact, unless it can be shown that the buyer could only have reasonably considered the statement to be an opinion.
