1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew-mc [135]
3 years ago
12

What made the U.S. Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore in 2000 so unusual? a. This case was not meant to be a precedent. b. It wa

s decided in a 5–4 vote. c. The public interpreted the justices’ disagreements as political in nature. d. It involved two former vice presidents. e. The case had far-reaching implications./387356230/test
History
1 answer:
ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The right answer is:

a. This case was not meant to be a precedent.

Explanation:

In its sentence in the case Bush v. Gore of 2000, the US Supreme Court stated that it can´t be used as a precedent.  After halting the manual recount and hearing the arguments of the parts, the high court voted 7-2 on December 12, 2000, to overturn the Florida court´s decision, arguing that various methods and standards of the recount process violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.  

You might be interested in
One new weapon used in World War I was chemical gas.
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

Thats true!

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Canadian Pacific Railway was primarily built by who?
Serhud [2]

Answer:

Macdonald

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The term "Columbian Exchange" is used to describe the exchange of goods, technology, education, and diseases between the America
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Because they had <u>a massive exploration by the mother country</u> (the one responsible by the conquest), <u>which took a considerable part of their goods.</u>

Explanation:

The Latin American colonies were different from the British Colonies (Thirteen Colonies and Canada) <u>because they were explored massively by Portugal and Spain during the three centuries of colonialism.</u> The Iberian countries were following an economic and political idea called <u>Mercantilism</u> which, as the main aspect, was<u> the exploration of a colony, taking the goods and sending it to the mother country. Only a small part was left for the colony.</u> And why those colonies don't rebel against the mother country, you may ask. Because since the very moment the Iberian countries began their colonization, they didn't leave any possibility of revolution, with laws and severe control of the settlers and natives. <u>Any try of revolution or riot was massively dismissed with violence.</u>

7 0
2 years ago
Jeopardy challenge 10 points <br>who was the 29th president of the United States?​
sashaice [31]

Answer:

Warren J. Harding was the 29th President.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By the mid-1700s, what was the world on the brink of?
Oksana_A [137]
It was Political upheaval
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Mayflower Compact
    15·1 answer
  • River systems were important to the development of the United States because they
    11·1 answer
  • ________ emerged as a major issue in the 20th century in the face of increasing evidence that pollution, uncontrolled use of nat
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Which describes the employment of women during World War II? (1 point)
    14·1 answer
  • Who was elected president of the continental congers?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of government?
    7·2 answers
  • What term describes a community of people who share customs, a language, values, laws, traditions, and government?
    7·1 answer
  • Any help please.!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Identify all of the people, events, and Supreme Court cases that created competing perspectives, conflict and tension in the dec
    5·1 answer
  • 1. True or False and why:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!