1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew-mc [135]
3 years ago
12

What made the U.S. Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore in 2000 so unusual? a. This case was not meant to be a precedent. b. It wa

s decided in a 5–4 vote. c. The public interpreted the justices’ disagreements as political in nature. d. It involved two former vice presidents. e. The case had far-reaching implications./387356230/test
History
1 answer:
ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The right answer is:

a. This case was not meant to be a precedent.

Explanation:

In its sentence in the case Bush v. Gore of 2000, the US Supreme Court stated that it can´t be used as a precedent.  After halting the manual recount and hearing the arguments of the parts, the high court voted 7-2 on December 12, 2000, to overturn the Florida court´s decision, arguing that various methods and standards of the recount process violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.  

You might be interested in
Why do muslims view this site as among the religions holiest
DIA [1.3K]
B eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
8 0
3 years ago
Can members of Congress be arrested for what they say in Congressional meetings?
anastassius [24]

No I don't believe so they are. Here is a link to something that says more on it. I hope this helps!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_or_Debate_Clause


7 0
3 years ago
Which country you were a part of the Allied powers during World War II -Germany -Soviet union -United States -Great Britain
zzz [600]

Soviet Union, United States, and Great Britain. Nazi Germany was a part of the Axis Powers.

6 0
3 years ago
Schools started integrating in the 1950s as a result of the _______ Supreme Court ruling.
netineya [11]
Schools in the United States started integrating in the 1950's as a direct result of the Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which requirement for the Ohio Supreme Court justices was removed in the 1851 Constitution?
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

Judges were no longer required to meet at least once a year in each county.

Explanation:

The Ohio Constitution of 1803, has many acts, among many of its acts was the requirement of Supreme Court Justices to hold court in each of Ohio's counties at a minimum of once per year.

However, by 1851, the number of counties had increased to the extent that it can no longer be possible for the Supreme Court Justices to satisfy this duty. Hence, this commitment was eliminated under the original constitution.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the president feel like he did not have the power to allow the louisiana purchase?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the immediate result of the Reform Bill of 1832?
    15·1 answer
  • How did industrialization spur european imperialism in the nineteenth century?
    14·2 answers
  • What reasons made Germany’s invasion of Poland in 1939 successful
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the Vietnamese resistance to French authority in indochina during the 19th century
    15·1 answer
  • How did emperor Augustus promote patriotism during the golden age of ancient rome
    6·1 answer
  • What type of government did Russia have under the Soviet Union?
    14·1 answer
  • Uncertainty about the U.S. economy and the possibility of war did what to the Stock Exchange immediately after reopening?
    9·1 answer
  • I
    15·2 answers
  • 3. The leader of most cities in Texas is a –​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!