Answer:
The answer is British colonialism
Explanation:
South Africa had been set in a similar setting to most of Africa. The truth is that when more powerful Europeans set up, it's no doubt disease ravaged their populations. Not only this but years of whites settling there had begun to greatly increase white birth rates.
A major white presence in South Africa is seen with the boers. The boers were white settlers who has been settled in south Africa for generations, they were mostly Dutch. This population naturally expanded further and further, until decolonization.
Now it is important to know this is a <em>very</em> simplified version of South Africas rich history, completely ignoring the change in power in south Africa from Dutch to British during the napoleonic wars.
After WWII, the effects of colonialism was seen not only in south Africa but other former British colonies like Zimbabwe, formerly rhodesia, which underwent a civil war over whether or not blacks or whites should hold the power.
To put it simply, colonialism and an ever expanding white population in South Africa can make it confusing to see a pretty white African nation so close to majority black nations.
I hope this helps.
The correct answer for this question is TRUE.
The Great Leap Forward, Mao Zedong's plan to increase China's agricultural and industrial production, was an overwhelming success. This is true as far as the great leap forward is concerned during Mao Zedong's administration.
Not sure how to answer this but hope this helps!
Specifically The three major religions in Europe are Christianity, unaffiliated and Islam.
Overall in Europe 47 percent of Christians are Roman Catholic, 18 percent are Protestants, and 35 percent are Orthodox (Rubenstein 2019, p. 140). Christianity is the most popular religion in Europe because of the establishment of the Roman Catholic Church. Europe was one of the first places the followers of Jesus traveled to spread his views.
They built churches and converted kings and emperors to these beliefs (Medievalists.net 2015).
Maybe while we wait for the questioner to provide the options, we can do a little general discussion here about what it means to use a primary source. Primary sources are things that come from persons directly involved in the events or lives being studied. So, any diary entries or letters of George Washington himself would count as primary sources. So would any official proclamations or letters or government documents that came from Washington's pen as president. Or the testimony of contemporaries of his who lived or worked with him would also count as primary source accounts.
So if you're looking for a historian's use of primary sources, look for the ways in which he's using historical material directly connected to the life of the person being studied. In fact, if you were able to look at a set of the false teeth George Washington wore, that would be a primary source too. They have a set at the Mount Vernon home/museum. And by looking at those actual dentures, you'd see they weren't made out of wood like the old (false) story says!
