Answer:
The classification of the given problem is discussed in the following subsection on the explanation.
Explanation:
It's also certainly expected that Jane's cooperative strategy for dealing with supplies will operate. The majority wins all strategy in today's global marketplace is riddled with a lot of consequences. Customer demand has become increasingly dynamic as well as any company that also has subcontractors prepared to fight from them will be guaranteed to win over the lengthy period.
- Reducing supply volatility is yet another aim that could only be accomplished in partnership with either the distributors. In today's climate, the buying process appears to backstop these dangers toward both, instead of just place itself as being a cost-effective component.
- There are also several actions she could take toward adopting a coordinated approach. Every one of those needs to begin with construction dignity and loyalty. Accountability to something like the consumer side is therefore a preliminary stage that would also help providers manage ahead.
- Providers who act very much like clients should be adequately compensated. Steps such as volume obligations for reduced costs, first rejection liberties, etc. must be urged to strengthen the supplier relationship.
Answer:
1. The firm does not have excess capacity.
Minimum transfer price on full capacity = Variable Cost + Contribution to be Lost
Minimum transfer price on full capacity = $360 + ($600 - $360)
Minimum transfer price on full capacity = $360 + $240
Minimum transfer price on full capacity = $600
Transfer Price = $600 per Unit (Market price per unit).
2. The firm does have excess capacity. Minimum transfer price on excess capacity = $360 per Unit (Standard Variable Manufacturing cost per unit).
Answer: variable costs cost which can be changed by time according to the produced product is known as variable cost. 2. Identify ...
Explanation: She makes most of the jewelry herself but she also buys items from large manufacturers. Her only other variable cost is her pay off her.
Answer:
Ideally, the amount of the social security payout depends on the average lifetime earning of the residents of the country. The government averages the earning and then finalizes on the amount to be paid by each of the resident. If the payroll tax increases, in the longer run a few workers will get affected but, in the short run the increase has its immediate effect on 92% of the workers. Out of the 92%, 78% have a phase out option whereas 48% of them are under the as-needed scenario.
But, the longer a rate increase is delayed, the higher the increase in lifetime taxes for later generations. Workers born1936–1990 would have higher increases in lifetime taxes under an immediate rate rise, workers born 1996–2005 would generally have higher increases in lifetime taxes under phased increases, and workers born 2006–2015 would have higher increases in lifetime taxes under as-needed increases. The future workers would experience the smallest tax increases under the immediate option. Lifetime taxes for workers born 2011–2015 would rise 16 percent under an immediate increase, 27 percent under phased increases, and 33 percent under as-needed increases.
Thus,The increase in the payroll taxes will increase the cost for the people at different income level, as it is calculated on the basis of the income of the individual. As the women are paid lesser than their male counterparts, it can be said that the male population will be affected more by the increase in the social security payout.
Explanation:
The answer is B. Thanks for your question! Don't forget to rate and give me the brainliest answer! Then, I can help you with all your problems! ^-^ ~
