Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
Unlike robbery, picking pockets does not involve "force or fear".
<span>The focal prerequisite of robbery is that the taking be by methods for either force or fear. One regular kind of theft including force is robbing, in which the criminal snatches the casualty around the neck from the back and persuasively expels his wallet or different resources. Other regular sorts of force include hitting a casualty with the clench hands, a firearm, or a limit protest. Cutting a victim's pocket is usually not deliberated robbery as there is no usage of fear and because robbery needs more force than that required simply to eliminate the property. </span>
I think it’s the very last one to redraw it’s borders,
