Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
Answer:
Explanation:
the united states and soviet union no longer supported dictators friendly to their sides.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Phileas Fogg is a name synonymous with world adventure! Which statement below is false for the real-life inspiration behind this memorable character?
He was one of the first Americans to travel through the interior of Japan.
He traveled by train from Cleveland to San Francisco
He was born in Exeter, on the river Exe
He visited Baghdad
Answer: He was born in Exeter, on the river Exe
Explanation:
Phileas Fogg was the main character of the novel Around the World in Eighty Days (1872), by Jules Verne. This character was based on William Perry Fogg, a widely known American adventurer. William was born in Exeter, a town in Rockingham County, New Hampshire, in the United States; not on the city by the same name on the River Exe in England.
Answer:
The powers assumed by the government that are not specifically listed in the constitution. Inherent powers. Powers that historically have been recognized as naturally belonging to all governments that conduct the business of a sovereign nation.
Answer:
During the Paleolithic, hominins grouped together in small societies such as bands, and subsisted by gathering plants and fishing, hunting or scavenging wild animals. The Paleolithic is characterized by the use of knapped stone tools, although at the time humans also used wood and bone tools.
Explanation:
