1. Tornado (Experienced)
2. Hurricane (Experienced)
3. Tsunami (Watched)
4. Earthquake (Watched)
5. Sandstorm (Watched)
1. Scared, worried. The winds were really fast, and my power had went out. I didn't wanna leave the bathroom ;-; The fact that tornadoes are scary is enough for me X_X
2. I felt slightly calmer, but still insecure. The reason is because here where I'm at, we have hurricane seasons a lot, so it's nothing new. But just knowing how dangerous they are and what they can do is somewhat scary.
3. Scared. First, tsunamis are so gosh darn huge, which makes them super scary. Second, Their damage is just- too much. They can wipe away a whole city. Third, there's not much of a way to get out of the situation if you're near it
4. Scared aswell. Earthquakes can open up a huge portion of the ground, and can cause sinkholes. They also can be the cause of Tsunamis.
5. Less scared. Sandstorms aren't that dangerous but still have the somewhat scary look, kind of like tsunamis except dust/sand all that stuff and different colors.
Hope I helped :>
The devil's advocacy decision-making technique is where an individual in the group is allowed to become the critic in the proposed decision
Explanation:
This decision technique helps prevent groupthink and increases the chance of a high-quality decision. It also helps prevent companies from making expensive, risky decisions.
Answer:
From about 1900 to 1965, most African Americans were not allowed to vote in the South. White people in power used many methods to keep black people from voting. Some of these methods also prevented poor white people from voting. Today there are still laws and customs that make it harder for African Americans, other minorities, and some whites to vote.
This is an example of psychological conditioning. When a stimulus (a flash of light) is paired with a consequence (an electric shock), the subject has a particular behaviour (pulling the finger away). After enough repetition, the subject will learn to associate the two, and the stimulus will be enough to motivate the behaviour, even when no consequence is present.
After several trials without the consequence, the subject will again dissociate the stimulus from the behaviour, and will go back to his pre-study pattern, in a process called extinction.
