1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergij07 [2.7K]
3 years ago
13

Compare the status of the german military forces in 1939 with those of the poles in 1939

History
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
6 0
In 1939, a treaty was signed by Britain, France, and Poland. France made a promise to help Poland if Germany launches an offensive in their country. However, Poland did not receive the expected military back up from France and was left in the fight and lost because of the strong military army of Germany.

That time of war, Poland army was not as great as the Germans'. If France had helped Poland, the war could have turned out differently.
You might be interested in
Which statement best completes the diagram?
irga5000 [103]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

States have some independence from the federal government as part of checks and balances

7 0
3 years ago
The boxers believed that:
MrRissso [65]

i believe the answer is d im not really sure

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did different religious groups gain protection under Muslim rulers?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

To begin, we need to first grasp the basic terminology relevant to the study of religious minorities. Religious minorities are known as dhimmīs, short for ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, a term that later became synonymous with the People of the Book.[4] The original meaning of al-dhimmah, however, meant protection, and it was often short for dhimmat–Allah wa-rasūlih, or the “protection of God and His Prophet.”[5] In short, the concept originally had a divine connotation, or a meaning that was directly related to the power of God. However, the concept soon morphed into a technical legal term with the progression of classical scholarship, and it consequently lost its transcendent dimension.[6] As a result, ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, has become a legal term and not a reference to the recipients of divine protection. It is important to discuss the etymology of the word because it demonstrates the significance of the people of the dhimmah who, at the very root of it all, are people who were to be protected on behalf of God and His Prophet ﷺ – an immense responsibility. This status is awarded to People of the Book (who according to many scholars includes Zoroastrians and others) who agree through contract to pay the jizyah, or poll-tax, in exchange for that protection.[7] In sum, the formation of the people of the dhimmah was rooted in religious minorities paying a tax that exempted them from military service. Much more nuance can be embedded within all of these terms that are sometimes highly contested among scholars, but considering the limited scope of this paper, we will move forward to address the larger picture at hand.

The power of the Muslim state was dependent on its ability to provide two precious resources to its people: security and justice.[8] Christians and Jews and other minorities were not technically citizens of the Muslim state; they were considered outsiders under the protection of the state, leading to the title of dhimmah, or protected people.[9] Their protection was guaranteed in a number of ways: by providing them with legal autonomy – meaning they could maintain their religious practices without interference – and protection during war. That said, there have no doubt been incidents throughout history in which that protection was threatened or revoked and the Muslim ruler engaged in persecution of religious minorities.[10] The fact remains, however, that there was never widespread systematic persecution of Christians, for example, in the Islamic world as there was in the late Roman Empire.[11] And the hostile circumstances that did occasionally arise, were not due to Islamic legislation per se, but were rather a result of an amalgam of social, political, and economic circumstances. So while Christians historically at times suffered at the hands of Muslims, it was almost never a result of their being Christian, or their beliefs, but a result of various factors related to the pursuit of power.[12]

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The Persians wanted revenge against the Greeks. Describe an
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

Well we were down 8-0 in baseball the other day, so they thought they were gonna win. Well, I hit 2 home runs, (grand slam and 3 run), and then we scored some others. We won 10-8.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELPPPPP DUE IN 20 ISH MINUTES
evablogger [386]

Answer: I think it would be A (please mark me as brainliest)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Based on the readings, albert barnes and james henley thornwell believed that god
    5·2 answers
  • In the period between world war i and world war ii, which group made the greatest gain in political rights
    13·1 answer
  • Read the passage from a letter by Christopher Columbus.
    9·2 answers
  • Historically, how many coup d’etat did Ghana experience after independence?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did supporters of using the atomic bomb reject the idea of dropping one on a deserted island? They thought the radioactive f
    15·2 answers
  • Use the word Geography in a sentence that<br>includes the word people,​
    5·1 answer
  • The allied with Great Britain during the French and Indian War.
    15·1 answer
  • 13. Which of the following is the least important reason the English wanted to
    13·1 answer
  • How would you explain the
    10·2 answers
  • What does sectionalism refer to?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!