See, your question has some grammatical structure problems, but I think I know what you're asking for.
I will reword your question and answer it to the best of my abilities.
Anything that is about government affairs or how to run a nation is political.
What's about history, how people lived, or social matters is usually cultural.
<span>Which is cultural and which is political (assuming you're referring to those titles listed below)?:
</span><span>In the Navy: A Record of the Navy from 1775 to 1875-- Political
Sculptures of the Late Qing Dynasty-- Cultural
The Social Impact of Literature from the Age of Enlightenment-- Cultural
</span>
<span>Henry IV versus Pope Gregory VII: Who Could Appoint Church Officials?-- Political
The American Revolution: Growing Tensions Between America and Britain-- Political
The Influences of the Star Wars Movies on American Society-- Cultural </span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Similarities: Reincarnation, Karma
Differences: Belief in a creator god, Caste system, Four noble truths
Explanation:
Answer:
...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”
Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...
Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).
The correct answer is salutary neglect. The name of the policy came from a speech that the philosopher Edmund Burke gave to Parliament in the 1700s. A policy then emerged wherein the colonies were, more or less, left alone. Certainly more than they would have been as a subservient colony to the Crown.
