Answer:
<u>possibly</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. <em>In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.</em>
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
learning skill is to hear,retain and then interpret what is being said
12th, 20th, 22nd, 23rd, 25th all deal with the presidency and presidential elections.
According to the Espionage Act, it is illegal to intentionally disclose classified information without consent. Up to ten years in prison, a hefty fine, or even being accused of treason are possible penalties.
The disclosure of classified material is prohibited by a number of federal statutes. The law bans the knowing and intentional transmission of specific classified information to an unauthorized person under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 798. Only information about American communications intelligence systems and operations is covered in this section. Any of the following actions concerning sensitive information that are done knowingly and willingly are illegal:
- communication, provision, transmission, or availability in any other way to an unauthorized individual
- Release it
- Use it in a manner that is harmful to government interests or safety.
A conviction for unauthorized disclosure carries a sentence of up to 10 years in jail, a large fine, or both.
To know more about classified information, refer:
brainly.com/question/25031712
#SPJ4
