On February 24, 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that students at school retain their First Amendment right to free speech. The story of this landmark case begins four years prior, during the early wave of protests against the Vietnam War.
Answer:
C. Determine how the law applies to a situation
Explanation:
Se extingue cuando el pago de la deuda se hace efectivo de manera reglamentada y en la forma como fue pactada la obligación quedando liberado el deudor y demás sujetos de la obligación.
Wreckorp wants to maintain an exclusivity image and limits its distribution to 100 stores in each region. it is Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided.
<h3>Are Wreckorp's actions illegal?</h3>
We cannot say if Wreckorp's actions are legal or illegal because the information provided does not give the full facts.
The actions of Wreckorp may be legal if no monpolistic agenda is going on but it could be illegal if this is the case. More information is therefore needed to make a proper assessment.
Options for this question include:
- Strictly illegal
- Strictly legal.
- it is Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided
Find out more on the legality of business actions at brainly.com/question/4556120.
#SPJ1
A three-fifths compromise is the compromise that has been made by the slaves for the purpose of taxation and representation for a white person.
What is a three-fifths compromise?
A three-fifths compromise is a kind of agreement that has been made between the Northern and Southern state delegates at the U.S. Constitutional Convention (1787). It was mentioned in the agreement that direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives would be done by the three-fifth slaves.
The compete question is attached in the image below.
Thus, three-fifths of the compromise was basically done by slaves for white people.
Learn more about the three-fifths compromise from here:
brainly.com/question/10987562
#SPJ1
