1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irakobra [83]
3 years ago
7

What internal evidence was cited for the support of Solomon as the author of Ecclesiastes? Use complete sentences Please Thanks!

History
2 answers:
lora16 [44]3 years ago
8 0

The internal evidence cited from “Ecclesiastes” to support Solomon’s authorship agrees with his perspective as a ruler and a father. The first evidence is the name he gives himself in the book – Qoheleth, which means “Preacher”. The “Ecclesiastes” is the book of wisdom which represents Solomon’s “last words” on the subject of kingship and assembly to determine the next king (Ecclesiastes 1:1, 2 12; 7:27; 12:8-10). The second evidence is the problem of succession because Solomon doubts David’s wisdom. This concern of succession accords with the story of foolish Rehoboam in Bible (Ecclesiastes 2:18-21). And the third evidence reflects ironic references to the division of Israel and Solomon’s greatness was being consigned to the oblivion that he feared. This refers to the prophecy of the reign of Jeroboam whose name was byword for sin.  The kings of divided kingdom of  Israel “followed in the sin of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel sin” and were consigned to the oblivion(Ecclesiastes 4:13-16).

pantera1 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The internal evidence cited from “Ecclesiastes” to support Solomon’s authorship agrees with his perspective as a ruler and a father. The first evidence is the name he gives himself in the book – Qoheleth, which means “Preacher”. The “Ecclesiastes” is the book of wisdom which represents Solomon’s “last words” on the subject of kingship and assembly to determine the next king  The second evidence is the problem of succession because Solomon doubts David’s wisdom. This concern of succession accords with the story of foolish Rehoboam in Bible. And the third evidence reflects ironic references to the division of Israel and Solomon’s greatness was being consigned to the oblivion that he feared. This refers to the prophecy of the reign of Jeroboam whose name was byword for sin.  The kings of divided kingdom of  Israel “followed in the sin of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel sin” and were consigned to the oblivion.

You might be interested in
The United States is one of five permanent members of the United Nations’ __________.
marshall27 [118]
The United States is one of five permanent members of the United Nations b) security council. The other member states are: Russia, France, China and the United Kingdom. The Security Council is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations and is charged with the maintenance of international peace and security, as well as accepting new members into the United Nations and approving any changes to the United Nations charter.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two of the following were main causes of Arab-Israeli conflicts in the twentieth century
zalisa [80]
Two main causes of Arab Israel conflicts in the twentieth century were:

a) the division of <span>Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. 

This general statement is quite known, as all three monotheistic religions claim ownership of the Holy Land. 
We can generally say that after the Crusades, Christians remained out of the conflict due to the massive losses they faced when they had tried to invade and conquer it (when Salah Al deen was at power, before the rise of the Ottoman empire). 

I am not sure about this one, but I assume the best answer would be D)</span><span>US support for Israels military
</span>
It's a generally known fact that the US is a close ally of Israel, and this is mainly why there are immense issues and conflicts between the two religions whom are living in the same territory/land. 


Generally, this topic tends to be those ones that kind of get biased responses (you know, due to people taking sides). I tried making this response as non-biased as possible, filtering it from opinion and such. 


Hope this helps. Comment if you need assistance. Glad to assist! :) 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anyone know anything about the great debate In American History?
Anarel [89]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

american debate was held between the us president and the opposition party

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write yes or no next to each statement. Then write similarities between the two codes below.​
Gnesinka [82]
No no yes no no yes yes yes no no
3 0
3 years ago
According to the scenario, what decision do you need
Mazyrski [523]
Shaggy the scoby doo
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How long did the watergate investigation take
    10·1 answer
  • Hich pair of surveyors set out to solve a land dispute between the British and Colonial Americans, but ended up creating a divid
    9·1 answer
  • What prompted President Roosevelt to call December 7, 1941, “a day which will live in infamy”?
    7·1 answer
  • The citizens of Saint - Dominique were uhappy with france because _
    6·1 answer
  • Marx and Engels believed that workers should improve conditions by taking political office?
    12·1 answer
  • I neeed help pleaseeee
    12·2 answers
  • How did President Jefferson and Congress work together to send representatives to
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the historical significance of Ancient Greece.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the Soviet agricultural policy immediately following Stalin’s concentration of power in 1928?
    7·1 answer
  • 2. Which revolution most directly addressed the unequal distribution of
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!