Answer:
All of the above are true
Explanation:
- the Strategic Profit Model (SPM) can assist the logistics manager in the evaluation of cash flows and asset utilization decisions.
Strategic profit Model will contain several prediction on the firm's future profitability. This information will help managers to decide whether they should change the way they allocate their resources or to maintain the current usage in order to achieve their goals.
- the SPM fails to consider the timing of cash flows
The information that is made in Strategic Profit Model is based on the cash flows that received within one financial period. This create a little bit of weakness in this model since the timing of cash flows really determine whether the managers could or couldn't execute the decision. Having a plan to act while not having the resources to do it at the correct time will be useless.
- the SPM is subject to manipulation in the short run
Since the SPM is projected for the long run, managers could manipulate the data in order to please the shareholders.
- the SPM fails to recognize assets that are dedicated to specific relationships
SPM make its prediction based on generalization of all assets, liabilities, and equities that the company has. So, if there are assets owned to specific relationships, the SPM will still automatically consider it as part of assets that is used to generat profit. This will make the prediction become a little bit inaccurate.
The world's most slowest animal is a Sloth.
Hope This Helps!
Theodor Adorno is the scholar who presumed that exceedingly partiality individuals are really shaky conformists.
Adorno made numerous commitments to basic hypothesis, eminently his view that reason had turned out to be caught with control and enduring. Adorno begat the term 'personality considering' to depict the procedure of straight out idea in present day society, by which everything turns into a case of a theoretical, and accordingly nothing individual in its real particular uniqueness is permitted to exist. He mourned that mankind had gone from understanding the world through myth to understanding it through logical thinking, however that this last "edification" was the same as understanding the world through myth. The two modes make a perspective that the subjective must comply with an outside world to which it has no control.
C. It didn't give states enough power.