The ironic law of oligarchy was introduced by <em>Robert Michels</em> and introduced to be<em> </em><em>applicable to all the groups of polity.</em>
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The ironic law of oligarchy represented the theme, of oligarchy postulating through the thought that the <em>political growth in the organization</em> can be achieved through generation of hierarchy.
The hierarchy is believed to <em>achieve the growth by its own</em> and maintaining its very own elite class of leadership. The theory thus formed was not scientifically tested, or argued upon mining metals, nor was this applicable to capitalists only.
Answer:
Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Human partnerships will be strengthened: Since bartering does not necessarily result in a flawless trade, people must trust one another to keep their word as conditions change. Since goods are not as easily divisible as property, you will have to take part of your payment now and part later. Bartering would also make more of our company public so we'd have to share both our needs and our abilities, allowing our bartering group to get to know us better.
Answer:
The correct answer is all of the above.
Explanation:
The progressives of the early 20th century wanted among other things:
- To increase democracy - they promoted women's suffrage out of a religious motivation. They thought that women would vote purely on a moral basis.
- To attain social justice - the progressives were worried about corruption, poverty, and malnutrition. They impulsed the creation of the FDA, and sought the removal from office of corrupted officials who they thought, caused poverty by being inefficient and committing crimes such as embezzlement.
- Improve the negative effects of industrialization and urbanization - the progressives were worried about infraestructure, public sanitation, water supply, among other issues that were problematic in cities in the early 20th century.
Answer:
its capital city was located between Europe and the middle east.
it's D
Answer:
The two dogs sitting here are already poor and ignorant