Answer:
$36,020.40
Explanation:
The computation of cash balance is shown below:-
Excess of cash receipts over disbursement = Beginning cash balance + Cash receipts - Cash disbursement
= $64,500 + $1,302,200 - $1,310,000
= $1,366,700 - $1,310,000
= $56,700
Interest = X × 0.02
Cash balance at end = Excess of cash receipts over disbursement + Borrowing - Interest
$92,000 = $56,700 + X - 0.02x
$92,000 - $56,700 = 0.98x
X = $35,300 ÷ 0.98
= $36,020.40
a) ( 0.8509718, 0.8890282)
b) ( 0.7255, 0.7745)
Explanation:
(a)
Given that , a = 0.05, Z(0.025) =1.96 (from standard normal table)
So Margin of error = Z × sqrt(p × (1-p)/n) = 1.96 × sqrt(0.87 × (1-0.87) / 1200)
=0.01902816
So 95 % confidence interval is
p+/-E
0.87+/-0.01902816
( 0.8509718, 0.8890282)
(b)
Margin of error = 1.96 × sqrt (0.75 × (1-0.75) / 1200) = 0.0245
So 95% confidence interval is
p+/-E
0.75+/-0.0245
( 0.7255, 0.7745)
Answer:
The correct answer is: Typically, some resources are better suited for producing one good than another, which means that there are diminishing returns when moving such resources away from producing what they are best suited for.
Explanation:
A production possibility curve shows the different combinations of two goods that can be produced using all the given resources. Since resources are scarce, to increase the production of one good we need to decrease production of the other.
But resources are specialized and cannot be perfectly substituted between their two uses. So as we go on increasing production of one good the opportunity cost of sacrificing its alternative goes on increasing.
Because of this increasing opportunity cost the shape of the frontier is downward sloping, bent outwards and concave to the origin.
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
