730/27 or improper fractions 27 1/27
Answer:
A) None
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst, for example, if s = 3, t = 4, and n = 12, then both s and t are factors of n, but 
is not a factor of nst = 144.
2) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst. Let s be 4, let t be 6, and let n be 12. Then n is a factor of both s and t, but 
is not a factor of nst = 12*24. In fact, it is a greater number.
3) Again, s+t isnt necessarily a factor of nst, let s be 2 and t be 3. Then both s and t are factor of n = 12. However 5 = s+t is not a factor of nst = 72.
So, neither of the three options is guaranteed to be a factor of nst. In fact, for s = 4, t = 6, and n = 12, none of the three options are valid.
Answer:
first choice
Step-by-step explanation:
make 1/3 and 1/2 a common denominator, which is 6.
1x2
- = 2
-
3x 2 6
1 x 3
- = 3
-
2 x 3 6
now u have 2/6, and 3/6
u subtract 2/6 by 3/6 since ur finding a solution to an inequality. remember to do the opposite sign.
2/6-2/6 = 0 (u cancel that out)
3/6 - 2/6 = 1/6
now u have
q>1/6
since there's no 1/6 the first choice is the most accurate
Answer:
its a
Step-by-step explanation:
on edge
Answer:
answer: B: Angle 2 and angle 8 are alternative interior angles
