<span>Once the organization structure is in place, a supervisor must identify the tasks to be done, combine them into jobs, and then formalize the process through a: D. Scalar Chain
In a scalar chain, there is a clear distinction of authority between the supervisor and te employees. In this process, the employees are free to communicate to the supervisor about anything</span>
Answer:
Depreciation expense 2019= $17,062.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchase price= 102,000
Useful life= 8
Salvage value= 11,000
To calculate the depreciation expense under the double-declining balance, we need to use the following formula:
Annual depreciation= 2*[(book value)/estimated life (years)]
2018= 2*[(102,000 - 11,000)/8]= $22,750
2019= 2*[(91,000 - 22,750)/8]= $17,062.5
Answer:
3482.12
Explanation:
Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator
Cash flow = net income + depreciation = 16,200 + 3300 = 35,700
($56,100 - $7500) / 3 = 16,200
Cash flow in year 0 = 56,100
cash flow in year 1 and 2 = 35700
cash flow in year 3 = 35,700 + 7500
i = 5%
NPV =
Answer:
<u>Predatory pricing</u>
Explanation:
A "predator" refers to an animal who survives by "preying" on other animals.
Predatory pricing in a similar sense refers to that form of excessively low pricing which in a way consumes other firms by taking away their share of industry revenues. Such form of pricing is considered illegal and is against healthy competition.
Such pricing eliminates competitors from the market and gradually leads to emergence of a monopoly i.e supremacy of a single firm in the whole industry and thus considered an illegal practice.
In the given case, the retail chain can be alleged to have followed predatory pricing which is substantiated by the fact that it cuts it's prices excessively i.e even below cost , thereby forcing smaller companies to exit the industry.
Of the following, the best criticism of the argument above is that it overlooks the possibility that certain factors operating in the 1980’s but not in the 1970’s diminished people’s incentive to save and invest.
<span>If these other factors, unrelated to the inflation rate, that operated in the 1980’s but not the 1970’s, created an even greater disincentive to savings and investment than high inflation rates provide, then those trends do not provide evidence about the general relationship among savings, investment, and inflation. </span>
