Explanation:
1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.
2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable
Measurable:
Experience on the job,
Productivity
Level of education,
immeasurable :
Skill set
Vision
Likeliness to bstay at firm
3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.
4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.
Answer:
sensitivity analysis
Explanation:
According to my research on different business strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the senior management is undertaking sensitivity analysis. This is a study of what kind of relationship exists between the inputs and outputs of a system and how much uncertainty exists between them. This is what the senior management is undertaking when determining different factors which might lead to different profit projections.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
BE A NICE AND AMAZING GUY :D
Explanation:
In this case, Nike is incorporating corporate governance into its business model, which is defined as a model for managing companies using the best market practices, using transparency, equity and social and environmental responsibility as essential parameters.
Companies today are no longer perceived by society as merely profitable entities, it is a social demand that companies assist in the development of society and minimize their impacts on the environment.
When companies develop programs to support society and sustainability, it guarantees the advantages of being better positioned in the market, attracting more investors, adding more value to its products and services and gaining a strategic and competitive advantage in the market.
Answer:
the total contribution margin is $245,700
Explanation:
The computation of the total contribution margin in the case when the sales volume rise by 40% is shown below:
Since the sales volume is rise so the contribution margin is also rise by 40%
Therefore the total contribution margin would be
= Contribution margin × (1 + increased percentage)
= $175,500 × (1 + 0.40)
= $175,500 × 1.40
= $245,700
Hence, the total contribution margin is $245,700