Starting from top down:
No power to tax - Congress could not pay for a military or other things to benefit the common good
No power to regulate trade - States might trade unfairly with each other or with other nations.
No executive branch - States felt free to ignore laws the didn't like
No national court system - No one could interpret the laws or settle disputes between the states.
No chief executive - There was no prominent leader to represent the nation and act decisively.
Difficult to amend - It was almost impossible to change the government for the better.
Only one branch of government - There was no separation of powers,, and no checks and balances.
The Bernstein's historical account is much more accurate because both of the Document B and C provide the evidence for his argument.
<h3>What is meant by
historical account?</h3>
A historical account is also called biography and it is written from the author's personal knowledge. account. experience etc.
In conclusion, the Bernstein's historical account is much more accurate because both of the Document B and C provide the evidence for his argument.
Read more about historical account
<em>brainly.com/question/24466312</em>
Answer:
Literary Realism
Explanation:
Writers who belonged to the literary realism movement (such as the ones listed in the question) decided that they wanted to depict life and society as it was in their books. They had a particular interest in the lives of marginalized peoples in the overcrowded cities of the era (the 19th century marked the start of the transition from rural, agricultural-based societies to urban, industry-based societes in Europe).
Answer:
Explanation:
It was made to let people know that the counsituion is supreme law
