I once went to a football game, and my team lost. so, the next time i go to one of their games they will lose again." This is an example of a weak inductive argument. Inductive reasoning allows for the possibility that the conclusion is false and inductive argument is an<span> argument that is intended to be strong rather than valid. </span> It is a failed<span> inductive argument, because it is intended to be strong but is in fact weak.</span>
The three reasons for settlement were Charity, Economics, and Defense. 1) Charity: King George II had his prisons filled with people who didn't deserve to be there, and he needed a place to put them, because the place was overflowing. This made it easier for James Oglethorpe to convince King George II to let him use the new colony as a place for debtors. 2) Economics: If people went to the colony, not only would they be paying of their debts, but also, it goes into Mercantilism, where Great Britain could use Georgia and export all of the raw materials and use them for the wealth of Great Britain, because the small country simply did not have enough natural recourses to sustain everyone. 3) Defense: The English were worried about the Spanish who controlled Florida. They wanted to create Georgia as a buffer colony, to protect South Carolina, because it had a lot of recourses. With Georgia acting as a buffer colony, if the Spanish decided to attack, they would have to cross Georgia territory. The defenders would keep the Spanish at bay for as long as they could, and hope that British reinforcements would soon arrive to aid the defenders.
Answer:
delivered to each defendant.
Explanation:
The purpose of this delivery is to ensure that the defendant have enough time to properly prepare their legal defense to address the issue/complaint. Not only that, it will also give the defendant enough time to find suitable lawyers to represent them along with the fund that they needed to hire their defense team.
Answer:
they are endowed by their creator with unalienable rights
Explanation:
Definitely, Zack will have the problem lack of objectivity and lack of the technical know-how on how to pursue a case successfully within the judicial system.This means that a self-represented litigant may fail to point out the real issues to be discussed and this may render their cases null and void.
