1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
3 years ago
12

1. When was the decision made in the Texas v. Johnson case?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Goryan [66]3 years ago
6 0
1. June 21, 1989
2. <span>In an appeal, Johnson argued that burning the American flag was symbolic </span>speech<span> and protected by the First Amendment. The Texas appeals court agreed and overturned his conviction. Unsatisfied with the decision, the state of Texas, appealed the ruling to the </span><span>United States Supreme Court

</span>
gogolik [260]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Texas vs. Johnson is a decision of the Supreme Court made in 1989, invalidating the ban on the public burning of the American flag. The majority opinion was prepared by William Brennan. The court found that flag burning as a form of protest is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

The defendant, Gregory Lee Johnson, participated in the 1984 Republican National Convention rally in Dallas against President Reagan's policies. Demonstrators marched through the streets and shouted slogans. One of the participants tore the flag from the building and gave it to Johnson. When the march reached the city hall, Johnson doused the flag with kerosene and set it on fire. Many demonstrators supported him with shouts.

Under Texas laws, Johnson was sentenced for vandalism to a year in prison and a fine of $ 2,000. Johnson appealed to the Texas Fifth Court of Appeals, but lost. Johnson then filed with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state’s highest criminal court. The Court of Appeal acquitted Johnson, equating his actions to speech.

State representatives said that maintaining order and protecting the symbol of national unity is more important than the right to freedom of speech, expressed in a symbolic and ambiguous form. The court took the exact opposite position. As a result, at the initiative of the state, the case was transferred to the Supreme Court.

In the court's view, the protection afforded by the First Amendment does not end only with the spoken and written word. The court thus rejected the argument that the flag can not be characterized as speech (since the First Amendment only protects speech). What is important for a procedure to be characterized as speech is the intention to convey a particular message through that process, as well as the likelihood that the message will be understood by those who see it.

You might be interested in
The ___________ Compromise broke the deadlock at the Constitutional Convention concerning the issue of representation.
Zolol [24]

Answer:

Connecticut Compromise.

Explanation:

The Connecticut Compromise took both the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan, and merged them. It called for a two house (rather than a one house of both plans), and compromised both plans into one. In the Senate, the New Jersey plan was used, in which each state was only allowed 2 representatives each for basic equality, while in the House of Representatives, the Virginia Plan was used, to ensure that there was a proper ratio of representatives to the current population.

~

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the governments of the united states,Mexico, and Canada created the north american free trade agreement in order to
cestrela7 [59]
Remove the barriers of trading between the three countries
5 0
3 years ago
Pleasseee helpp!<br><br> In your own words, describe the process of natural selection.
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
In natural selection, only the fittest organism are able to survive long enough to reproduce. Therefore, only these organisms pass on their genetic information, as they were "selected" by nature.
5 0
3 years ago
Three strategies which local municipality is implementing in addressing lack of clean water issue.
STALIN [3.7K]
Three strategies which local municipality is implementing in addressing lack of clean water are: First, Local municipality can fund reliable water projects that serve villages and schools. Next, dams and rain catchment system can also provide reliable source of drinking water. Lastly, train the community or educate about sanitation facilities and hygiene then multiply the impact.
8 0
3 years ago
Carefully explain the short-and long- run consequences
kumpel [21]
<span> long- run consequences</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were Sherman Grant and Lee all headed toward Richmond at the end of the war
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the leader of the Bolsheviks and what did he make illegal?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a reason that the missouri compromise did not have lasting effects?
    5·1 answer
  • What propaganda technique uses slogans?
    6·1 answer
  • In her field research, dr. safarian observes that people generally do not sit next to strangers on trains. she also notices a si
    10·1 answer
  • Consider the Capilano Canyon experiment (Dutton &amp; Aron, 1974). What is the explanation for why the men crossing the more fri
    13·1 answer
  • What is an example of guidance?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE SOMEONE HELP FAST!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Plzzz I'm begging helppppp
    12·1 answer
  • How can reduction of export of primary goods improve people's lifestyle
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!