Answer: they were generic, and they had no unique value communicated
Explanation:
Value proposition refers to the promise
that's made by an organization to its customers indicating why a product should be bought.
Since Clay looked through ten different propositions and found them to all be ineffective, the reason attributed to this will be due to the fact that the propositions were generic, and had no unique value communicated.
Suppose there is a decrease in the price of butter.There will be an increase in demand for bread.
<h3>Option (B) is correct</h3>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Bread and butter are complementary goods. They are demanded and consumed together. So their demand are positively correlated which means an increase in demand of one will lead to the same increase the demand of other
If the Price of butter decreases, it will lead to an increase in the demand for butter. With the increasing demand for butter, the demand for bread will automatically increase. Both demands will move in the same direction.
Answer:
Explanation:
When an individual’s current money income exceeds his current consumption desires, hesaves the excess. Rather than keep these savings in his possession, the individual mayconsider it worthwhile to forego immediate possession of the money for a larger futureamount of consumption. This trade-off of present consumption for a higher level of futureconsumption is the essence of investment.An investment is the current commitment of funds for a period of time in order to derivea future flow of funds that will compensate the investor for the time value of money, theexpected rate of inflation over the life of the investment, and provide a premium for theuncertainty associated with this future flow of funds.2.Students in general tend to be borrowers because they are typically not employed so haveno income, but obviously consume and have expenses. The usual intent is to invest themoney borrowed in order to increase their future income stream from employment - i.e.,students expect to receive a better job and higher income due to their investment ineducation.3.In the 20-30 year segment an individual would tend to be a net borrower since he is in arelatively low-income bracket and has several expenditures - automobile, durable goods,etc. In the 30-40 segment again the individual would likely dissave, or borrow, since hisexpenditures would increase with the advent of family life, and conceivably, the purchaseof a house.In the 40-50 segment, the individual would probably be a saver since incomewould have increased substantially with no increase in expenditures. Between the ages of50 and 60 the individual would typically be a strong saver since income would continueto increase and by now the couple would be “empty-nesters.”After this, depending uponwhen the individual retires, the individual would probably be a dissaver as incomedecreases (transition from regular income to income from a pension).4.The saving-borrowing pattern would vary by profession to the extent that compensationpatterns vary by profession. For most white-collar professions (e.g., lawyers) incomewould tend to increase with age. Thus, lawyers would tend to be borrowers in the earlysegments (when income is low) and savers later in life. Alternatively, blue-collarprofessions (e.g., plumbers), where skill is often physical, compensation tends to remainconstant or decline with age. Thus, plumbers would tend to be savers in the earlysegments and dissavers later (when their income declines).5.The difference is because of the definition and measurement of return. In the case of theWSJ, they are only referring to the current dividend yield on common stocks versus thepromised yield on bonds. In the University of Chicago studies, they are talking about thetotal rate of return on common stocks, which is the dividend yield plus the capital gain or
Answer:
c. Increase by $0.1 trillion
Explanation:
Investment spending Multiplier is a concept in economics that measure how a given change in investment increases output. So if current output of $13.5 trillion must increase to $14 trillion, we employ the multiplier formula to derive what amount of investment spending is needed to get $o.5trillion increase in output.
(change in output)/ (change in investment) = 1/(1-mpc)
Note that mpc means marginal propensity to consume.
Let change in investment = X
change in output = 14 - 13.5 = $0.5trillion
mpc = 0.8
(0.5)/X = 1(1-0,8)
0.5/X = 1/0.2
cross multiply
X = 0.1
Thus the needed change in investment is an increase of $0.1 trillion. In other words, if investment increases by $0.1 trillion, current output will increase from $13.5 trillion to $14 trillion.
