Answer: regulation
Explanation:
Citizens are allowed to sue federal administrative agencies who are empowered to make specialized rules and regulations that would enable them to properly enforce the mandate given to them by Congress.
Of course one cannot just sue at the first instance, there must have been a series of appeals to various bodies within this agency to repeal the rule or regulation that is causing grief. If those bodies refuse and it is found that the agency did not act in good faith in making the rule, the court will hear an appeal on the matter without exhaustion.
The conflict in the United States then was that Congress do not have the power to tax and they do not also have the power to monitor foreign and interstate commerce, etc.
<h3>What was this issue about?</h3>
The Articles of Confederation was said to have made a kind of loose confederation where there was a sovereign states and then a kind of weak central government.
Conclusively, Here, almost all power were said to be with the state governments. and thus issue were said to arise as Congress do not have the power to tax and they do not also have the power to monitor foreign and interstate commerce, etc.
Learn more about conflict from
brainly.com/question/24769299
#SPJ1
Yes it is possible to test for nichitewn
Answer:
The two most prevalent types of city boundary changes are incorporation, which is the creation of a city government in unincorporated territory of a county, and annexation, which is the addition of unincorporated territory to an existing city.
Answer:
You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?
b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?
