I dont know but yeah hope you find the answer
<span>That there was no contractual obligation binding on Kandis to keep house and that it was just a 'gentlemen' agreement between the two. The court will observe that in the absence of a written agreement Kandis still has ownership rights. The situation is exasperated if there were no witnesses to the payment of the down payment.</span>
Answer:
D) win, because locke had apparent authority to bind the partnership.
Explanation:
Apparent authority refers to an an agent (in this case Locke) that has the power to act on behalf of a principal (the partnership), even though that power has not been expressly granted. The principal's conduct must imply that it has granted that power to the agent in order for a third party to reasonably believe it.
In this case Locke is a partner, so he is part owner of the partnership, that is why Gage reasonably believed that he had the power to place the order. Usually if the agent (Locke) had apparent authority, the principal (the partnership) will be liable for his actions.
Answer:
C. triple bottom line.
Explanation:
The triple bottom line should be greatly considered by Sunset Oil in establishing their drilling company in the Gulf coast.
Triple bottom line is an accounting framework that contains aspects of social, environmental and financial considerations.
- The clap back by the locals on the establishment of this firm will have dire consequences on these three main elements of the triple bottom line.
- We cannot isolate one for the other.
- To the local hosting community, they might be interested in the environmental implication.
- But in due honesty, the company will have to evaluate the social and financial this push back will have on the deal.
- The effect of this would be on the profit, the people and the planet which mimics the financial, social and environmental consideration.
Answer:
found out his boss was ordering the selections of document and reporting it was the right thing to do