Answer:
He is a very experienced hunter
Explanation:
Rainsfords character was able to tell that the animal was big, but that the gun used to shoot it was a smaller one. he was also able to tell that the hunter who shot the animal was not able to kill it at first.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. I will first Identify the claim. The claim is sometimes stated in a very general way, then elaborated on throughout the essay.
2. I will next examine the claim for qualifiers; words like "some," "many," "most of the time," etc. It can sometimes be damaging to an argument to omit qualifiers, particularly if there are also no exceptions provided. It is up to you as a reader to determine whether the writer's unqualified claim is damaging to this particular argument.
3. I will then examine the claim for an exception. After looking for qualifying words in the claim, the next step is to determine what the writer considers to be the situations in which the writer's claim doesn't apply. In other words, it is necessary to identify any exceptions the writer makes to her claim.
It is A. Documents that were written in the past. It is in the past therefore part of history... (had to add some extra words to give the answer lol)
