Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Criticism can be looked at in many different perspectives. Criticizing on one subject by looks may not bother you, but criticism about your athletic ability might make you feel negative about yourself. For me personally, I attempt to ignore the criticism and if not I express it to my friends.
Answer:
The price of tee times needs to be decreased by 6.67%.
Explanation:
The manager wants to increase the number of tee times sold by 10 percent.
The price elasticity of demand for tee times is –1.5.
Percentage change in price of tee times to increase the demand by 10%
Price elasticity of demand = 
-1.5 = 
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: Diseconomies of scales.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept known as <em>''diseconomies of scales''</em>, in the field of economics and management, refers to the situation where an organization finds itself in problems due to the fact that a large production is being produced by them and the coordination and management of that large production is beginning to cause trouble and that impacts in the fact that the company will produce good or services with an increase in the cost per unit of the products.
Answer: C
Explanation:
This is because although the coupon rate is devoid of federal income tax any market discount is taxed as interest income earned. So so if there is a way that they can be taxed without jeopardizing their basic Federal income tax-free status, why not? The discount can be accreted annually and tax paid, or the tax can be paid at maturity or sale date.
