No. No. It is not linear because the slope has to be able to be plugged in to any x, y coordinates and be placed on the line.
![\bf \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{63}}{4\sqrt[4]{6}}\qquad \begin{cases} 63=3\cdot 3\cdot 7\\ 6=2\cdot 3 \end{cases}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3\cdot 3\cdot 7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2\cdot 3}}\implies \cfrac{\underline{\sqrt[4]{3}}\cdot \sqrt[4]{3}\cdot \sqrt[4]{7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot \underline{\sqrt[4]{3}}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3}\cdot \sqrt[4]{7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3\cdot 7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B63%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B6%7D%7D%5Cqquad%20%0A%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0A63%3D3%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%207%5C%5C%0A6%3D2%5Ccdot%203%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%207%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cunderline%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B7%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cunderline%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B7%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%5Ccdot%207%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D)
![\bf \textit{now, rationalizing the denominator}\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\cdot \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{2^3}}{\sqrt[4]{2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}\cdot \sqrt[4]{8}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot \sqrt[4]{2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21\cdot 8}}{4\sqrt[4]{2\cdot 2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{4\sqrt[4]{2^4}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{4\cdot 2}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{8}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bnow%2C%20rationalizing%20the%20denominator%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B8%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%5Ccdot%208%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5Ccdot%202%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E4%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B4%5Ccdot%202%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B8%7D)
and is all you can simplify from it.
so... all we did, was rationaliize it, namely, "getting rid of the pesky radical at the bottom", we do so by simply multiplying it by something that will raise the radicand, to the same degree as the root, thus the radicand comes out.
Answer: Complementary angles. x = 60
How I got it.
x - 30 + x = 90
then solve for x
Hope this helps!
19. 60* - a straight line is 180* - the other side which is 120* (supplementary)
20. 132* - the angle below is the same as the other side of this angle, 180* - 48* (same side interior angles)
21. 48* - these are the same angle just in different placements (corresponding angles)
22. 70* - same angles just different placement (alternate interior angles)
23. 85* - these are vertical angles so they’re the same
24. 114* - same angle just different placement (alternate exterior angles)
