1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga_2 [115]
3 years ago
15

Now that you have gone over both readings, write a short paragraph in which you compare the two. How are they alike?

History
1 answer:
natka813 [3]3 years ago
6 0

Both readings communicate the fact that  slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is  more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious  context.

Explanation:

Both the readings reflect the fact that slavery is  and criminal in nature and its a sinful act to slave an individual  ,the reading also indicate that they don t support such practice. Both the readings shows individuals dealing with the hardship of slavery and both the reading also display their protest against the Fugitive Slave Act.

Thus we can summarize that

Both readings communicate the fact that  slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is  more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious  context.

You might be interested in
At the end of his life, Joe McCarthy was which
Veseljchak [2.6K]
The answer would be B
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What could be an Origin Story or Myth about Abraham Lincoln’s childhood?
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

The story about how he chopped down his fathers cherry tree

8 0
3 years ago
PLZZ HELP ASAP THE QUESTION IS TIMED
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

d or b

Explanation:

most likely

8 0
2 years ago
in the second paragraph, what did churchill claim could have prevented germany from taking the sudentenland? Did he offer any ev
olchik [2.2K]

Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:

  • They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.

<h3>What is a claim?</h3>

A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.

In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.

Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:

brainly.com/question/24909197

8 0
2 years ago
Southerners were against the tariff because they traded cotton with Europe for _______________, and the tariff made these items
Dafna1 [17]
They traded cotton with Europe for manufactured goods.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did president hoover do to offer a solution to the human problems of the depression in 1929?
    11·1 answer
  • What geographic factors led to the decline of Sumer?
    5·2 answers
  • Based on the Articles of Confederation, which of the following
    13·1 answer
  • British soldiers traveled to Lexington and Concord in search of... (select all that apply)
    6·1 answer
  • Why did many children work?
    6·2 answers
  • Which two energy transformations are shown in the photo? A. Chemical energy → electromagnetic energy B. Chemical energy → therma
    12·1 answer
  • THIS IS TH HARDEST AND LONGEST QUSTION ON BRAINLY prt 1
    7·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a fief and a manor?
    15·1 answer
  • Modernize Odysseus speech<br> Summerize the speech
    13·1 answer
  • Most "old" immigrants to the United States came from Western Europe, but most "new" immigrants came from
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!