Standardization and innovation play critical roles in the development of goods and services. Standardization allows for a stabilized starting point in which to move forward and develop other goods and services which is related to innovation. Standardization provides stability, a known factor which can be relied upon, whereas innovation is riskier and may not come to be successful endeavor. However, like all risk, that is the payoff for the investment in innovation, for if the innovative good or service can be successfully brought to market, the dividends for a payout can be well worth it.
Answer:
Answer is given below.
Explanation:
it is absolutely exploitative to adjust the maturing of the records receivable with no legitimate explanation so as to diminish the remittance made so as to expand the benefit and show an off base monetary record figures to the partners. The controller can't subjectively choose to change the records receivable to cut down the noncollectable records as at some point or another a similar will be found during review and a similar will be hailed off as a fake. The long haul results you would confront incorporate landing terminated from the position, having your authorized dropped in the event that you are CPA and may likewise confront lawful prosecutions. You should disclose to the controller that so as to simply introduce a decent benefit for the present year it can place into the danger for the future and put their vocation in question. Additionally, a similar won't be valued by the investors and the organization may go on free its altruism.
Answer:
Walker's did not outperform because it PE Ratio is close to Industry average. Industry's data is based on average which means some of the firms may have very high PE ratio and some might have quite lower than the average. It is not obvious that the Walker's outperformed or under-performed. Complete data about the individual firms might make us able to compare the performance of Walker's. Apparently its performance is up to the mark as its PE ratio is very close to Industry average.
Explanation:
<u>PE Ratio</u> is a term which show the investors confidence on the firm. It shows that how much price investors are willing to pay against each unit of earning.
Answer:
1 EUR = 120 JPY
Explanation:
As the purchasing power parity theory, the exchange rate of currency 1 to currency 2 = Cost of good in currency 1
/ cost of same valued item in currency 2
In this case, a Lexus LS400 and a Mercedes C300 are considered to be of equivalent value, then the exchange rate between the yen and the euro
= price of Lexus in Tokyo/ price of Mercedes in Stuttgart
= 6,000,000 JPY/ 50,000 EUR
= 120 JPY/EUR
D Yhe client has passed away and his or her will Cannot be located
