Answer:
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Explanation:
Given Cash outflow = $10 million
Provided cash inflows as follows:
Particulars Good condition Moderate condition Bad Condition
Probability 30% 40% 30%
Cash flow $9 million $4 million $1 million
Average expected cash flow each year = ($9 million X 30 %) + ($4 million X 40%) + ($1 million X 30%) = $2.7 million + $1.6 million + $0.3 million = $4.6 million
Three year expected cash flow = ($4.6 million each year X 3) - $10 million = $13.8 million - $10 million = $3.8 million
While calculating NPV we will use Present Value Annuity Factor (PVAF) @12% for 3 years = 
NPV = PV of inflows - PV of Outflows = $4.6 million X 2.402 - $10 million = $11.0492 million - $10 million = $1.0492 million
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Answer:
Yes the inspector should be hired
Explanation:
Defective average = 0.03
inspection rate = 30 per hour
Cost of inspector = 8 per hour
Correction cost is $10 each
No inspection = 9/30
= 0.300
Inspector = 8/30
= 2.67
Yes the inspector should be hired
<u>National Computers, Inc., was incorporated in Nebraska, has its main office in Kansas, and does business in Missouri. National is subject to the jurisdiction of </u>( a)Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri
Explanation:
<u>There are certain Jurisdiction Based on Real Property Ownership which are limited and are termed as "in rem" jurisdiction</u>
A state( Kansas ,Missouri) has limited jurisdiction (which lawyers term as "in rem" jurisdiction) over a non-resident person or business that owns real property in the state. The Jurisdiction is limited in two ways:
- Jurisdiction is applicable only to the fair market value of the real property. This means that if you sue a non-citizen who owns an business worth $800,000, then in this case ,your judgment can be worth is $800,000.
- Also if , the claim is related to the property. For example, if you met an accident on the property of a non-resident owner of an business house, you could get jurisdiction over the owner. But you could probably not get jurisdiction over the non-resident owner if the lawsuit grows out of an entirely separate problem that has nothing to do with the apartment house.
Strategic partnerships are seen as one of the foundations of supply chain management.
I would say C. Hope this helps!
