A. Bias by placement, because bias by labeling would be something to the effect of calling the liberals point of view uneducated, or giving there view some negative label, bias by omission would mean completely ignoring the other side, and not covering it at all, whereas all the other ones don't really fit, bias by placement is something to the effect of airing one side in the morning, while everyone is watching, and airing the other one after everyone is asleep, which is what is done here, which we know by the sentence "<span>liberal point of view at the end."</span>
Answer:
The main difference between traditional trade and modern trade is that, distribution in modern trade is more organized. Retailers often deal directly with manufacturers. Many large retail chains have integrated their services to offer their own brands in groceries and other goods.
Explanation:
Answer:
The earnest money must be returned to the buyer.
Explanation:
The loan objection deadline sets a specific by which the buyer must present a written notification to the seller stating that he/she will not be able to purchase the property due to problems related to obtaining a mortgage loan (or really any other reason, since only the buyer knows about his/her loan status). After this date, if the buyer cannot secure the mortgage loan and finish the purchase, the earnest money will be lost and must be given to the seller.
Answer: 20 women
Explanation:
Making the total number of women in the club 'x', we can then do the following,
Total Number of Names in Hat, N
N = x + 10 ( total number of men)
therefore total number of names in the hat N=x+10
We need to select 3 people so sample size = 3
Using the Hypergeometric Distribution then we can then use the formula,
Expected number of women on the Committee = k * n / N
Where k is the total number
2 = x * 3 / (x + 10)
2 = 3x/(x +10)
3x = 2x +20
x = 20
There are 20 women in the club.
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.